Courts Family Law Media Law Legal News privacy protection legislation in the constitutions Research

Courts Family Law Media Law Legal News privacy protection legislation in the constitutions Research Legal Legal dictionaries International Law Israeli online trial Business Law Criminal Law books and publishers Intellectual Property postemail Law
Google Apple Security opinions Spam Copyright gambling Microsoft freedom of expression online commerce administration postemail Trademarks Privacy pornography patents Facebook open source computer crimes evidence file sharing communication Domain Names
HTML and links to service providers' liability payment methods Ethics web browsing and privacy spam online gambling encryption and digital signatures copyright contracts and e-commerce defamation and freedom of expression Constitutional Law Criminal Law Legal Microsoft Internet Jurisdiction Patents electronic evidence regulation of the Internet uses legal Internet Domain Names
Third
12
28
Google Apple Security opinions Spam Copyright gambling Microsoft freedom of expression online commerce administration Trademarks Privacy pornography patents Facebook open source computer crimes evidence file sharing communication Domain Names
A few months after the entry into force of Canadian law prohibits the transmission of spam, the Commission imposed a radio, TV and telecommunications in the country (the CRTC) first administrative penalty, $ 1.1 million, of violations of the law. The fine was imposed on the company Compu-Finder, which provides training postemail and consulting services for business management and business development, the Commission received numerous complaints in relation to the mailing practices of this company. Following an investigation conducted by the Commission, it found that the company sent commercial electronic messages to recipients without their consent, postemail in violation of the law. The Commission also found that the removal mechanisms press release did not work properly and that the messages were sent to addresses which were identified by the Company by scanning websites and collecting data from them. Commission statement said that collecting email addresses by the Company may establish a cause in accordance with the country's privacy laws. While the fine imposed significantly lower than the sum of the maximum Commissioner may award (10 million dollars), is imposed with respect to only four documented violations of the law (if that any violation may relate to thousands of recipients postemail who received the same message.) In addition, the fine was imposed in relation to Sending in the immediate vicinity of the entrance of this law (07/02/2014), contrary to expectations that the Commission would demonstrate a certain tolerance with respect to violations of the law in the initial period after the entry into force. Source : Stikeman Elliott (by David Eldar).
attorney breeding. Do not copy, publish, distribute, market, sell, rent, lend or give any other right in this document without the consent of Credit prior written consent. This document does not constitute legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, current or exhaustive. Whoever does or stopped based on this document does so at his own risk.