Is it acceptable that a group of government employees, working in the office or prefecture, which the manager ups ground will be re-applied for selection for this position, took an active part in the activities undertaken in the course of the campaign?
There is no doubt that 2014 is an election year. We will be doubled because it became to the polls - election to the EuropeanParliament and local elections. Both the first and second are very important, but each selected in one group representatives will be in front of other tasks to perform. And while it may appear that these are important to EuropeanParliament, from the perspective of everyday life, the reality around us and the space in which we must live, but they are probably more important local elections. They can often be not less emotion than the theoretically important. And although this year they will be held in late autumn, now louder ups ground begins to talk about the candidates, about the campaign and the chances of winning.
From a formal point of view, the election campaign will begin, however, until the date of promulgation by the President of the Council of Ministers Regulation of elections, and will end 24 hours before the election, when he takes so. election silence. However, there is no doubt that in the moment you notice some elements of commercial de facto local government election campaign.
Mayors and mayors often exhibit hyperactive suspicious. Organize all kinds of events, under the guise of course other events, but by the way they will not fail to inform residents about further (beyond 2014) the development plans of the municipality (city). By a strange coincidence suddenly accelerated at a tremendous rate the investments, so that even before the fall has been closed. Although all are well aware of the importance of such activities, it is officially ups ground they have nothing to do with the election campaign.
The fact that in this way the campaign starts much earlier ups ground and violates the principle of equal opportunities for all candidates in force (most of which even at this point we do not know), there is only one of the elements that cause negative feedback. More important is the question that in this way it is carried out with the use of the office workers who have to organize such projects are somehow involved due to their duties, and most importantly the hidden campaign is financed from public funds, which has a policy ups ground because of his position .
However, it is practically impossible to demonstrate clearly that these actions - undertaken in an election year - are unofficial election campaign. From this can account for local authorities currently in office only a wise society, taking in the coming elections, the decision on whom to vote.
Much more problematic is the issue of local government employees to engage in official election campaign ups ground already in progress. Is it acceptable that this social group, employed in the office, the manager will be re-applied for selection for this position, took an active part in the activities undertaken in the course of the campaign?
Consideration of this issue should be started from realizing that something else is the "mayor" as the executive body of the municipality, and another substrate room - a person performing functions of the mayor (performing the functions of the body). This was pointed out in the judgment of WSA June 1, 2005 (II SA / Wa 211/2005, LexPolonica ups ground No. 1,182,589). Mayor of the municipality has the authority to perform specific tasks and powers, represents it, act on its behalf, and as a guardian of the body, being a natural person is also your personal life, and it is within this life decides to re-candidacy. So the question in the elections is his (as an individual) a private matter, which absolutely should not transfer the exercise of their professional duties. Possible re-election campaign should ups ground deal with after hours and outside the workplace, so that no one could accuse him of that example. Benefited from a municipal photocopiers, copying even one document for the purposes of the campaign, or that they ordered the employee to some office in the execution of his work hours activities going beyond ups ground his duties and serving agitational activities.
But does this mean that local government employees who support ups ground the current mayor, ups ground satisfied with his rule, in cooperation with it, they can not help him in seeking another term? In accordance with Art. 106 1 of the Code electoral it (Journal of Laws of 2011, no. 21, pos. 112 with later. D .; hereinafter q), each voter can lead campaigning for candidates, including collecting signatures in support of candidates filing the prior written voting proxy consent. It is important, however, that these signatures collected in the place, time and manner exclude
No comments:
Post a Comment